Welcome
From THE FUTURIST, March-April 2008, Volume 42, Number 2
By Cynthia G. Wagner
Who we are and what we see are both becoming increasingly ambiguous in the digitally mediated world.
Students model their VCom helmets to show how “virtual existence communication” affects interactivity.
The rise of instant connectivity and community building through communications technologies may to some extent be keeping people farther apart. Instead of dropping by your cubicle to show you pictures of their own new puppy, your office mates will forward you the Halloween-costumed dog pictures they (and a few thousand other people) received in their e-mail that day.
Social networking in the virtual world means you may never know what your “friends” really look like, but you’ll have up-to-the-minute details on their daily lives.
Is this disconnected connectivity so indispensable as many have come to believe? That’s one of the questions posed by Iain Carnegie of the University of Dundee’s Duncan of Jordanstone College of Art and Design. Carnegie designed a VCom (virtual existence communication) helmet for the university’s Masters Show “to make us think about how our communication is increasingly virtual, leading to a diminishing need for physical presence during communication.”
The consumer products industry has become increasingly opportunistic in adding functions to cameras and phones, for instance, giving many people the feeling that they must be able to watch movies or listen to their record collections on their phones. Carnegie believes we should be questioning that sense of urgency.
“What my project is looking at is to what extent all this new technology is now coming between us as a society, now that the need for a physical presence in the context of communicating with each other is diminishing rapidly.”
The VCom helmet includes a monitor that the wearer views and a screen that the rest of the world sees instead of the wearer’s face. This effectively shuts the user off from the outside world as he or she interacts virtually. The images of themselves that users project onto that screen may or may not be who they really are — an increasingly troublesome aspect of the digitally mediated culture, Carnegie notes.
About the Author: Cynthia G. Wagner is managing editor of THE FUTURIST.
For more information, contact: University of Dundee, Press Office, Dundee DD1 4HN, United Kingdom. Web site www.dundee.ac.uk.
- Printer-friendly version
- Login to post comments
- Learn About Us
- Read and Research
- Chapters and Conferences

You are viewing a free content sample from THE FUTURIST magazine. To take advantage of exclusive member benefits, and unlock full access to THE FUTURIST and its archives, join the World Future Society, today.
Scanning the Future of Law Enforcement: A Trend Analysis By Eric Meade
Coming, The Biggest Boom Ever By McKinley Conway
How to Feed Eight Billion People By Lester R. Brown
Want the future delivered directly to your inbox?
Sign up for our free online newsletter and receive our latest white paper, also free.Poll
Tweets from the Year 2030
Free Email Newsletter
Sign up for Futurist Update, our free monthly email newsletter. Just type your email into the box below and click subscribe.
This site is best viewed with Internet Explorer 8, Firefox 3.6, or Safari 4-5.






